Discovering the Thrilling World of VR Slot Games
-
- By David Fisher
- 15 May 2026
Former President Trump stated on Saturday that his Moscow-drafted proposal for peace constituted not his ultimate proposal, following strong criticism from Ukraine's leaders and commentators that likened it to the Munich pact of 1938 between Chamberlain and Hitler.
During short remarks from the White House, the US president informed journalists: Our goal is to achieve peace. It should’ve happened a long time ago … we are attempting to conclude it, one way or the other it must be resolved."
Ukrainian and American officials will meet in Switzerland this Sunday to discuss the plan. Security officials from France, Britain and Germany will also participate in the talks in Geneva.
Ahead of these discussions, American lawmakers informed media outlets that State Department head Rubio reached out to them while en route to Geneva for clarification on the details of this disclosed proposal. He said, the proposal did not originate from the administration but instead a "wish list of the Russians", according to independent Maine senator Angus King, a member on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Nevertheless, the former president has set Zelenskyy until Thursday to sign the 28-point document. It calls on Kyiv to cede territory under its control to Moscow, downsize its military forces, and surrender advanced weaponry. It also excludes a European peacekeeping force and penalties for atrocities committed by Russia.
In a sombre address last Friday, the Ukrainian leader warned that his country faces an impossible choice in the near future involving preserving the nation's honor and forfeiting key ally in the shape of the US. Zelenskyy acknowledged that Ukraine is experiencing an extremely challenging period in its history.
Speaking this weekend, Zelenskyy emphasized that genuine or respectable peace was always based on "guaranteed security and justice". He announced a negotiating team, appointed by presidential decree, which will meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, headed by top aide Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate from Ukraine's team, former defence minister and national security council secretary Umerov, stated there would be discussions with Washington "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Hinting at limits, Umerov noted: Ukraine enters these talks with defined goals. This is another stage of the dialogue that has been ongoing in recent days and is primarily aimed at aligning our vision for the next steps."
Zelenskyy has attempted to participate positively with the US administration apparently intent to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has made clear that he will not surrender Ukraine’s sovereignty or disregard a constitution that protects the country’s current borders.
At a meeting in South Africa, leaders from the G20 and EU representatives issued a joint statement pushing back on the proposed deal, stating it needs further refinement. It said that members of the EU and NATO would need to be consulted regarding certain clauses, which rule out Ukraine's NATO accession and put conditions on its European Union membership.
Responses from Ukrainians to the proposal, prepared by Putin’s envoy and Trump’s representative, have been largely negative. Commentators argued it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: not only of Ukraine but other European regions too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in Ukraine’s 2014 pro-democracy Maidan revolution, remarked it drew comparisons with the Munich Agreement. Trumps’s peace plan came from the same "recognisable genre", where the affected party is asked to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
In a Facebook post, Nayyem expressed he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. This offended people who had hidden in basements in Bucha or Mariupol – where Russian troops executed hundreds of civilians – and families of deported children to Russia. A deeply cynical deal, he concluded.
Speaking in a Kyiv subway station, Sariskyi, 21, commented that Moscow has attempted to control Ukraine politically and territorially "for years". It conceded "barely anything" in the proposed deal and continued to keep its forces on Ukrainian soil. "I think the deal is an attempt to break Ukraine and force unjust conditions on us," he remarked.
Should Ukraine accept the terms Kyiv would be forced to sacrifice its liberties, he added. If it didn’t, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a vital resource of battlefield information for Ukraine's forces. "There is no good way out of this for now," he noted.
Another passenger, 19-year-old Sofia Barchan, said that Ukraine would "keep strong" without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Crimea and the eastern regions are part of Ukraine. They are Ukrainian land." She expressed that the president is intelligent and predicted he would not give up Ukrainian land.
Speaking during rainfall, next to a replica of Kyiv’s original medieval gate, Ivanovna said she was grateful to the former US leader for his peace-making efforts. She said that Ukraine should be ready ceding Crimea and the eastern Donbas region temporarily if it meant keeping America as a partner. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she said.
Previous European leaders have roundly condemned the plan. Finland’s former prime minister Marin described it as a disaster, affecting not just Ukraine but for "all of the democratic world". She warned if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – further hostilities could arise.
The former prime minister of Belgium, Guy Verhofstadt, referenced a statement by Churchill of an appeaser as "one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last". He added: "Trump now takes Putin’s side. Europe faces a choice between compromise and principles. A critical juncture for the European Union."